Home > Industry Insights >Servo
TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Product Support

microservices in net core with examples

Published 2026-01-19

Don’t let legacy code weigh down your mechanical systems

There are some things you must have encountered. The servo motor on the production line suddenly became unresponsive, the control accuracy of the steering gear decreased inexplicably, and the movement of the entire robotic arm began to experience unexplainable delays. Checking the hardware, everything is normal; looking at the software, the huge and cumbersome single application built many years ago is like a tangled ball of yarn. Every time you want to fix a small bug, it may cause three new problems elsewhere. Maintenance costs are getting higher and adding new features is like walking a tightrope. Is this feeling familiar?

This is not a failure of a single component, but the system architecture is old and out of breath. When your mechanical project becomes complex, when real-time performance, reliability and flexible expansion become important, the once reliable old system may have become the biggest bottleneck.

Microservices: “Separate” complex systems

What to do? It's a bit like dividing a large family. Rather than letting everyone squeeze into a big house and get entangled in everything, it is better to allow each member to have his own independent cabin, perform his own duties, and communicate through clear paths. This is the core idea of ​​microservice architecture. Split a huge single application into a series of small, specialized, independently deployed and run services. Each service only does one thing, such as specifically processing the angle command of a certain type of servo, or managing the speed curve of the servo motor.

Doing so brings clear boundaries. A problem with the motor control service doesn't bring down the entire order management system. You can fix, update, or even rewrite it individually without disturbing the entire system. This greatly reduces risk and maintenance headaches.

It is an expansion of freedom. Found that a certain visual recognition service is overloaded during peak periods? It's very simple. Just add an instance for this service. There is no need to expand the entire cumbersome application. It saves resources and is more agile.

It’s the diversity of technology. Each small service can choose the most appropriate tools and languages ​​for development based on its task characteristics, without being tied to the technology stack of the entire system. This makes it possible to adopt the latest and most applicable technologies.

When .NET Core meets microservices: Why it?

Great idea, but what to build it with?在众多选择中,.NET Core 展现出了独特的魅力。 It is inherently suitable for cloud and distributed scenarios.

Think about it, .NET Core is cross-platform and your services can run reliably on Linux servers, which itself brings flexibility to deployment and cost. Its performance is excellent and is crucial for high-frequency, real-time data stream processing in mechanical control. What's more, it has a mature and powerful ecosystem, from dependency injection to configuration management, from API communication to security authentication, all supported by official and community-carefully polished libraries, so you don't have to reinvent the wheel and can focus on the business logic itself - that is, how to better control your motors and mechanical structures.

Disassembly and construction: a simple thinking journey

The theory sounds good, but how to do it? Let's put aside the obscure terminology and use a minimalist scene to feel it.

Suppose you have a traditional control program that does three things at once: reads position data from the sensor, calculates the pulses required by the servo motor, and drives the motor to rotate.

Under the microservice architecture, we can try to break it down:

  1. "Sensory" services: An independent service that is only responsible for talking to the location sensor, continuously obtaining clean, calibrated data, and publishing it through a lightweight API (such as HTTP or gRPC).
  2. "Brain" service: Another service that subscribes to the data stream of the "sensory" service. It focuses on core algorithms to quickly calculate the exact instructions needed by the motor based on the position information it receives. It only does calculations, regardless of hardware.
  3. "Executor" service: The third service receives instructions from the "brain" and converts them into specific signals (such as PWM) that the servo motor can understand to directly drive the hardware.

These three small services can be developed, tested, and deployed independently. You can do "brain" calculations without restarting the entire system; you can add new sensor support to the "sensory" service without affecting the motor drive. They communicate through defined interfaces, just like several professional teams that work well together.

Choose the right partner

When embarking on the road to microservices, the choice of tools and concepts is very important. You need to consider how your services can communicate with each other efficiently and reliably (is it a RESTful API or the faster gRPC?). You need a service discovery mechanism so services can find each other. You need a unified configuration center and log aggregation so that you can still control the overall situation in a distributed environment. Of course, there's also fault tolerance: a temporary loss of connection to a service should not cause an avalanche of the entire system.

These sound complicated, but fortunately, modern frameworks and patterns already provide a wealth of them. The key is to design your service boundaries in a loosely coupled, highly cohesive way from the beginning. Remember, decomposition is not about showing off skills, but about managing complexity and gaining agility.

The way forward

Combining microservice architecture with .NET Core for the mechanical and motion control fields is by no means a simple replacement. It is a system-level thinking upgrade, a transformation from "a Big Mac" to "an elite team". This path may encounter challenges, such as the inherent complexity of distributed systems and network latency considerations, but the result is system resilience, technical freedom, and future-oriented scalability.

When your servo system needs to handle more complex tasks, when your mechanical project needs to respond to market changes faster, the elegance and power of this architecture will truly emerge. It keeps the code base clean and makes team collaboration smoother. Ultimately, the system you build is like a precision mechanical watch, with each component functioning independently and working together perfectly.

This is not only a technical iteration, but also the beginning of injecting long-term vitality into your cherished projects.

Established in 2005,kpowerhas been dedicated to a professional compact motion unit manufacturer, headquartered in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China. Leveraging innovations in modular drive technology,kpowerintegrates high-performance motors, precision reducers, and multi-protocol control systems to provide efficient and customized smart drive system solutions.kpowerhas delivered professional drive system solutions to over 500 enterprise clients globally with products covering various fields such as Smart Home Systems, Automatic Electronics, Robotics, Precision Agriculture, Drones, and Industrial Automation.

Update Time:2026-01-19

Powering The Future

Contact Kpower's product specialist to recommend suitable motor or gearbox for your product.

Mail to Kpower
Submit Inquiry
WhatsApp Message
+86 0769 8399 3238
 
kpowerMap