java microservices interview questions ibm

Things about servo motors and steering gears, and a journey about microservices

You may have just taken apart a robot kit and stared at the tiny servo motors and servos. They lie quietly on the workbench and look simple, but you know that for them to work together and perform a perfect dance, a smart and reliable "commander" is needed behind them. It's like you have a huge system on hand, with functional modules scattered all over the place, and you hope they can talk and cooperate flexibly and efficiently. At this time, what will you think of? Perhaps a lighter, more independent architectural approach.

Let’s talk about servo motors. It's not just a component that spins in circles, it receives signals and accurately moves to the commanded position or speed. The servo is more like its close relative and is often used where angle control is required, such as the joints of robots. They are very obedient, but the premise is that the instruction system you give it is clear, fast, and error-free. This reminds me of the old way of building complex applications by cramming all the functionality into one giant "box". The box is getting heavier and heavier, and it affects the whole body. If you want to change a small place, the whole system may be shaken. Doesn't it feel a bit like using a complex set of gears and linkages to control all the motors? One jam and the whole place comes to a standstill.

Therefore, people began to look for more elegant solutions. They took the big box apart and turned it into small independent units, each unit responsible for a specialized task. These units communicate with each other through brisk language, which is the core idea of ​​microservices. It makes the system feel like a band with clear divisions of labor, rather than a monolith that requires all the musicians to breathe in sync. Each service—such as a service that controls the rotation of a servo, or a service that processes sensor data—can be independently developed, deployed, and even written in a different “dialect” (technology stack). This brings tremendous freedom.

But new problems also came. When there are many services, how to manage the conversations between them? How to ensure that when a service goes down, it will not cause a chain avalanche? How to track how many services a request passes through to complete its mission? This goes back to our original analogy: you need a strong, robust "nervous system" to command these servo units. This system can handle service discovery (let each unit know where its peers are), load balancing (not overworking any unit), and fault tolerance (if one unit fails, tasks can be seamlessly transferred to other units).

At this point, you may be thinking, this sounds wonderful, but does it require a set of peerless martial arts secrets to realize it? Indeed, it requires careful design and the right tools. This is not just technology selection, but a philosophy for building reliable systems. It’s about how to make every joint (service) of a complex robot both autonomous and collaborative.

For example, when you choose a servo motor, you will look at its torque, response speed and accuracy. When choosing methods and concepts for building microservices, you'll also look at some key points: Is it lightweight and agile enough? Can the isolation and communication between services be handled well? Are there ready-made, tried-and-true models that reduce the risk of reinventing your own wheel? Is the documentation and community support sufficient to help you find your way when you hit a rough patch?

us(kpower) has deep experience in the field of mechanical transmission and precision control, and knows that the word "reliability" is equally important for mechanical systems and software systems. A wobbly link can cause misalignment of a robotic arm, and a fragile service link can throw an entire application into chaos. , the construction method we understand and admire naturally tends to the kind of design with clear modules, stable interfaces, and strong fault tolerance. This is no coincidence, but a common wisdom where the physical and digital worlds meet when solving complex problems.

Imagine you build with this idea. Each of your microservices is like a high-performance steering wheel, with a single responsibility and quick response. The collaboration protocol between them is like a carefully designed control protocol, ensuring that instructions are unambiguous and lost. The entire system has gained valuable flexibility: you can upgrade one of the services individually, just like replacing a more powerful wrist motor on a robot, without having to shut down and overhaul it. The expansion of the system has also become intuitive. Need more computing power? Simply add instances for specific services, like paralleling multiple motors for a heavily loaded joint.

Of course, the road is not paved with roses. You'll encounter challenges inherent in distributed systems, such as data consistency issues and the subtle effects of network latency. But that’s the fun of design, and what separates a robust system from a fragile one. Choosing design patterns and tool chains that have been proven in a large number of practices is like choosing reducers and bearings that have been tested for durability for your mechanical platform. They can absorb shocks silently and ensure smooth long-term operation.

In the end, whether a row of servo motors work together to draw a perfect circle, or a group of microservices seamlessly support a smooth user experience, the satisfaction is the same. It is the joy of a creator who tames complexity into simplicity, and transforms cumbersomeness into agility. What you build is no longer a rigid bunch of code or parts, but a living organism that can breathe and grow. This journey of association from concrete hardware to abstract architecture may bring you a different spark of inspiration for your next construction.

（kpowerWe always pay attention to the inheritance of reliability from core components to system integration. This pursuit of stability and precision runs through every technical level we understand. )

Established in 2005,kpowerhas been dedicated to a professional compact motion unit manufacturer, headquartered in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China. Leveraging innovations in modular drive technology, Kpower integrates high-performance motors, precision reducers, and multi-protocol control systems to provide efficient and customized smart drive system solutions. Kpower has delivered professional drive system solutions to over 500 enterprise clients globally with products covering various fields such as Smart Home Systems, Automatic Electronics, Robotics, Precision Agriculture, Drones, and Industrial Automation.